On Generals
The other day, we were driving along the road, and happened to see a Caucasian man walking down the street, a beer can in his hand.
"Look at this
angmoh," my mother commented, "he walked all the way to the supermarket just to buy himself a can of beer. How typical."
I mused at how these two simple statements, probably carelessly conceived, and simply spoken, reflected her mental relegation of
all expatriates to the beer barrel of debauchery and drunkenness.
Though I could hardly blame her. The human mind is engineered to generalise, to simplify matters into brain-digestible chunks of information. Such generalisation is facilitated by an insidious language that makes such liberal use of collective nouns and nouns alike.
For instance, many hippopotami can be grouped together as a bloat of hippopotami, though two bloats may not have the same number of animals nor even identical animals. Yet they are generalised, for our convenience, into two bloats.
Similarly, two men may be of antipodean tastes, intellect, physique and general character, yet they are still two
men rather than
two men. Imagine, if you and your mortal enemy could be considered one and the same on the basis that you both have eight orifices and one belly button. Surely, too simplistic a cateogrisation, but an indispensible one nonetheless.
So along we go, day by day, making hundreds of generalisations as our minds process the world around us, subjecting everything around us to our little prejudices and biases that form the enclosures with which we segregate all and sundry.
Now, count the number of generalisations I've made in this post.