On Emptiness
Let us strike the key-note, before pursuing the tune.
It is unfortunate, truly, to have one's future delineated by a piece of paper. Much more bitter than receiving less-than-hoped-for results is the consequence of those results. Of course, with boundless enthusiasm, the governing body suggests that there is no real drawback to the system. I suppose there really is nothing else they can say.
Myself, am not badly affected by this turn of events. Thus I am fortunate. But as always, there are those who are less so, and are forcibly ripped from friends they've established. There is a heaviness, and heart-pain, associated with such sorrow. It's not sweet at all. But, as ever we must be hopeful, and trust in our abilities. Contact can still be maintained. True, it is difficult, but not impossible, at least. Certainly, mirabile dictu, what with myself unaffected, listening to Enya, but still, surely it can be done.
Now, let us pursue the tune, Dickens.
My god, how I loathe and despise Dickens. Hard Times is one of those rare novels that I have extraordinary difficulty in ploughing through, and if not for the fact that I have to take an exam on it, I'd have chucked it in the sea long ago. What kind of sick, depraved Victorian mind conceives a name like M'Choakumchild? And so prolix! Ever and ever and ever anon, Dickens!
I have never liked Dickens. Ever since I was forced to read the great big pictorial version of Oliver Twist and frightened by Fagin's depiction, I have not liked Dickens. Ghastly, ghastly. Even a chinese dictionary would be better, what with their interesting pictures and evolution of chinese characters.
But Dickens reflects the epitome of English writing, surely? Rubbish. I can subsist quite happily on Blyton and Rowling, thank you very much. Or even oversexed Shakespeare, but constipated Dickens? As far as I'm concerned, his writing apotheosises the dull and dreary society he attempts to criticise.
Dahl for me, or Doyle, or Archer, but not, certes, Dickens.